On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:00:50AM +0200, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 02:32:19AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > We can probably get away with that now, but it does risk us ending up > > with some firmware that expects to run in physical mode (boards designed > > for Linux) and some firmware that expects to run in virtual mode (boards > > designed for Windows). The degree of lockdown in the Windows ecosystem > > at present means it's not a real problem at the moment, but if that ever > > changes we're going to risk incompatibility. > > Is there anything preventing calling SetVirtualAddressMap() with a > 1:1 map? No, but we've seen bugs as a result on some x86 systems. As far as the spec, though, you're fine. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
