Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > The memory layout figure above should have been in table format (it is > written as such, isn't it?): I'm not sure, given the "::" (verbatim) for the other tables. I followed the verbatim layout of the previous svXX layout descriptions. > However, for consistency, other similar figures should also be converted > to tables (as separate patch). Yes, that can be done as follow-up patches (and also add SV32). Björn
