On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 08:52:09PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I made a similar suggestion to extending the use of fixmap recently, see
> "Re: SCU registers mapping for CA9/CA5 cores". Russell pointed out that
> fixmap is intentionally limited to just kmap_atomic uses at the moment
> and changing that would potentially have a significant impact when we
> run out of pages in the fixmap area.
Is this an issue here, since (unlike x86) this early_ioremap only works
before paging_init()?
> The method we use on ARM normally is the iotable_init() function, which
> requires hardcoding a virtual address at the moment.
>
> It might be nicer to change that code than to put early_ioremap into
> fixmap. Note that early_ioremap in fixmap is a bit of a kludge on x86
> as well because it is very much /not/ a fixed mapping like the rest
> of fixmap, they just use it because it's convenient.
Yes, but they also only use it (at least the bits where I looked) for
temporary mappings very early in the boot process. That is certainly
how I use it. So at least my intention was to use it before kmap is
even available.
> Extending the iotable mechanism on ARM would be the convenient
> solution for us I think.
Could that easily be extended to give similar semantics sufficiently
that we can progress with merging more of the UEFI and ACPI support
together as common code with x86/ia64?
/
Leif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
