On 2022/10/20 22:04, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Rui Li <me@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Thanks for your reminding. I ran the check patch script before sending >> this patch. However, the original file Documentation/staging/xz.rst >> seems not has SPDX-License-Identifier header. > You cannot know what the license of the source file is, since it hasn't > been declared there. What you *do* know, though, is that it must be > GPLv2 compatible. Your translation can thus be strictly GPLv2. My > suggestion in such cases would be to put: > > .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > into translations of documents that lack an SPDX line of their own. > > Thanks, > > jon Thanks for your advice. I will add the GPLv2 license if the file lacks of license declaration. -- Rui Li 0x77E6D821D7AE84FE
