On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 08:50:03AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On 10/18/22 03:54, Dan Vacura wrote: > > With the re-use of the previous completion status in 0d1c407b1a749 > > ("usb: dwc3: gadget: Return proper request status") it could be possible > > that the next frame would also get dropped if the current frame has a > > missed isoc error. Ensure that an interrupt is requested for the start > > of a new frame. > > > > Shouldn't the subject line says [PATCH v3 1/6]? Yes. Clerical error on my side not updating this after resolving a check-patch error... Not sure if it matters as this patch can exist on it's own. Or if I can send this again with fixed subject line, but that may confuse others, since there's no code difference. > > -- > An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara >