On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 01:13:27AM -0600, Yu Zhao wrote:
> + for (i = pmd_index(start), addr = start; addr != end; i++, addr = next) {
> + pmd_t val = pmd_read_atomic(pmd + i);
> +
> + /* for pmd_read_atomic() */
> + barrier();
Please clarify the above. This is an entirely inadequate ordering
comment.
> +
> + next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
