Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] riscv: Support HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP and HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2022/10/11 20:39, Björn Töpel wrote:
> Liu Shixin <liushixin2@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Since riscv64 has already support SATP_MODE_57 by default, it is time to
>> support more hugepage-related features. These two patches will enable
>> HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP and HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC.
>>
> Just a note; The HP support does not require sv57. Pmd/Mega- and
> pud/gigapages work for sv39 and sv48 as well.
Yes, I didn't explain it clearly. I will rewrite it.
>> v1->v2: Fix the build error reported by kernel-test.
>>
>> Liu Shixin (2):
>>   riscv: Enable HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP for 64BIT
>>   riscv: Enable HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC for 64BIT
>>
>>  .../features/vm/huge-vmap/arch-support.txt    |  2 +-
>>  arch/riscv/Kconfig                            |  2 +
>>  arch/riscv/include/asm/vmalloc.h              | 18 ++++
>>  arch/riscv/mm/Makefile                        |  1 +
>>  arch/riscv/mm/pgtable.c                       | 83 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  5 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>  create mode 100644 arch/riscv/mm/pgtable.c
>>
> I've taken this series for a spin, and tested huge pud pages via
> ioremap(), and huge pmd pages via vmalloc_huge() on qemu for sv39, sv48,
> and sv57.
>
> Patch 2 have a spelling error in the commit message: "enbale" vs
> "enable".
>
> Fix up the spelling error in patch 2, and after that feel free to add
> for the whole series:
>
> Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
Thanks for your review and test. I will fix the above errors immediately.
> Nice work!
> Björn
>
> .
>




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux