Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > No objections from my side. Surely more things could be tweaked. In > particular, I didn't like having two ToCs at the index (a complete one > and a second one pointing to where we are at the docs), but that's a lot > better than before, so, I'm OK with that. Oops...that was actually a leftover from my initial attempts to improve the information there. That's not what the patches create...I've updated the rendered docs to reflect the actual output. Sorry for the confusion, jon