Re: kernel style preference trivia: '* const' vs '*const' ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2022-10-09 at 18:52 +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 6:21 PM Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > The kernel uses '* const' about 10:1 over '*const'
> 
> Yeah, going with the most commonly used one sounds best.
> 
> clang-format will be able to handle either way with
> `SpaceAroundPointerQualifiers` as soon as the minimum is LLVM 12.

Perhaps the below.

Perhaps it should be a --strict only CHK, but the rest of the const
tests are WARN as well.

---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 2737e4ced5745..eccd7940eb18b 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -4605,6 +4605,14 @@ sub process {
 			}
 		}
 
+# check for foo *const, prefer foo * const
+		if ($line =~ /\*const\b/) {
+			if (WARN("POINTER_CONST",
+				 "Prefer * const over *const\n" . $herecurr) &&
+			    $fix) {
+				$fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s/\*const\b/* const/;
+			}
+		}
 # check for non-global char *foo[] = {"bar", ...} declarations.
 		if ($line =~ /^.\s+(?:static\s+|const\s+)?char\s+\*\s*\w+\s*\[\s*\]\s*=\s*\{/) {
 			WARN("STATIC_CONST_CHAR_ARRAY",



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux