Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I would play with the sidebar options used by Alabaster in order to > try to make the TOC more useful. Definitely worth doing; I'm not sure how much flexibility there is there. I'd *really* like to avoid carrying our own theme if at all possible... The right solution might be to actually split the books apart and do the intersphinx thing; I've not really looked into that at all. > On a side note, one thing I miss on all default themes is a way to dynamically > use dark mode. That's btw why I ended adding non-default support for > 'sphinx_rtd_dark_mode' (which also requires an external package). At the time > I added CSS/themes customization support to the build system, this was the only > theme that allowed to switch to either dark/light mode. It would be really cool > if Alabaster (or some other default themes) could honor the user's preference > between light/dark modes. Yeah, Alabaster doesn't seem to have that. Providing that ability in conf.py shouldn't be *that* hard to do; it doesn't use that many colors, though there might be a fair amount of CSS to override. Thanks, jon