On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 01:57:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> This seems fairly complete, but I cannot have such a basic dependency onto >> the regmap tree this late in the merge window, i.e. I'm not ready to pull >> all of regmap into the pinctrl tree. I'd consider this for merging >> for the next kernel cycle so it's more orthogonal. > > I've got the patch on a topic branch in regmap to allow for this sort of > stuff - I can readily provide a signed tag for you to get just that > patch if that'd help? Alternatively I'm happy to carry the pinctrl > patch in regmap? I'm OK that you carry this in the regmap tree. Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> The clock retime weirdness convinced me that this cannot really use the generic pin config layout... Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
