Note that only x86_64 is covered and not all features nor mitigations are handled, but it is enough as a starting point and showcases the basics needed to add Rust support for a new architecture. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Co-developed-by: Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@xxxxxxxxx> Co-developed-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@xxxxxxxxxx> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst | 1 + arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + arch/x86/Makefile | 10 ++++++++++ scripts/generate_rust_target.rs | 15 +++++++++++++-- 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst b/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst index 1152e0fbdad0..6982b63775da 100644 --- a/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst +++ b/Documentation/rust/arch-support.rst @@ -15,4 +15,5 @@ support corresponds to ``S`` values in the ``MAINTAINERS`` file. ============ ================ ============================================== Architecture Level of support Constraints ============ ================ ============================================== +``x86`` Maintained ``x86_64`` only. ============ ================ ============================================== diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index f9920f1341c8..3ca198742b10 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ config X86 select HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE if HAVE_OBJTOOL select HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_CALL select HAVE_RSEQ + select HAVE_RUST if X86_64 select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS select HAVE_UACCESS_VALIDATION if HAVE_OBJTOOL select HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile index bafbd905e6e7..2d7e640674c6 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Makefile +++ b/arch/x86/Makefile @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ export BITS # https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53383 # KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow -mno-avx +KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Ctarget-feature=-sse,-sse2,-sse3,-ssse3,-sse4.1,-sse4.2,-avx,-avx2 ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT),y) # @@ -155,8 +156,17 @@ else cflags-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += -mtune=generic KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(cflags-y) + rustflags-$(CONFIG_MK8) += -Ctarget-cpu=k8 + rustflags-$(CONFIG_MPSC) += -Ctarget-cpu=nocona + rustflags-$(CONFIG_MCORE2) += -Ctarget-cpu=core2 + rustflags-$(CONFIG_MATOM) += -Ctarget-cpu=atom + rustflags-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += -Ztune-cpu=generic + KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += $(rustflags-y) + KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mno-red-zone KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mcmodel=kernel + KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Cno-redzone=y + KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Ccode-model=kernel endif # diff --git a/scripts/generate_rust_target.rs b/scripts/generate_rust_target.rs index 7256c9606cf0..3c6cbe2b278d 100644 --- a/scripts/generate_rust_target.rs +++ b/scripts/generate_rust_target.rs @@ -148,8 +148,19 @@ fn main() { let mut ts = TargetSpec::new(); // `llvm-target`s are taken from `scripts/Makefile.clang`. - if cfg.has("DUMMY_ARCH") { - ts.push("arch", "dummy_arch"); + if cfg.has("X86_64") { + ts.push("arch", "x86_64"); + ts.push( + "data-layout", + "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128", + ); + let mut features = "-3dnow,-3dnowa,-mmx,+soft-float".to_string(); + if cfg.has("RETPOLINE") { + features += ",+retpoline-external-thunk"; + } + ts.push("features", features); + ts.push("llvm-target", "x86_64-linux-gnu"); + ts.push("target-pointer-width", "64"); } else { panic!("Unsupported architecture"); } -- 2.37.3
