Thankyou for the comments.
On 24/06/13 23:08, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 06/24/13 08:53, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
>> +#include <linux/clkdev.h>
>
> Why do you need this include?
>
>> +#include <asm/mach/irq.h>
>
> And this one?
Removed them.
>
>> +static u64 gt_counter_read(void)
>> +{
>> + u64 counter;
>> + u32 lower;
>> + u32 upper, old_upper;
>> +
>> + upper = readl_relaxed(gt_base + GT_COUNTER1);
>> + do {
>> + old_upper = upper;
>> + lower = readl_relaxed(gt_base + GT_COUNTER0);
>> + upper = readl_relaxed(gt_base + GT_COUNTER1);
> [snip]
>> +static void gt_compare_set(unsigned long delta, int periodic)
>> +{
>> + u64 counter = gt_counter_read();
>> + unsigned long ctrl = readl(gt_base + GT_CONTROL);
>> +
>> + counter += delta;
>> + ctrl &= ~(GT_CONTROL_COMP_ENABLE | GT_CONTROL_IRQ_ENABLE);
>> +
>> + writel(ctrl, gt_base + GT_CONTROL);
>> + writel(lower_32_bits(counter), gt_base + GT_COMP0);
>> + writel(upper_32_bits(counter), gt_base + GT_COMP1);
>> +
>> + if (periodic) {
>> + writel(delta, gt_base + GT_AUTO_INC);
>> + ctrl |= GT_CONTROL_AUTO_INC;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ctrl |= GT_CONTROL_COMP_ENABLE | GT_CONTROL_IRQ_ENABLE;
>> + writel(ctrl, gt_base + GT_CONTROL);
>> +}
>
> Why is there a mix of the relaxed and non-relaxed io accessors?
gt_counter_read will be used very frequently, so using relaxed can
reduce latencies involved in memory barriers.
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CLKSRC_ARM_GLOBAL_TIMER_SCHED_CLOCK
>> +static u32 gt_sched_clock_read(void)
>
> notrace
>
Ok, fixed it.
>> +{
>> + if (!gt_base)
>> + return 0;
>
> Seems impossible? Remove this check?
Yep, I agree this case is impossible in the code flow.
>
Thanks,
srini
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
