Re: [RFC 2/2] x86_64, mm: Reinsert the absent memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 11:28:40AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > That's 4.5 GB/sec initialization speed - that feels a bit slow and the 
> > boot time effect should be felt on smaller 'a couple of gigabytes' 
> > desktop boxes as well. Do we know exactly where the 2 hours of boot 
> > time on a 32 TB system is spent?
> 
> There are other several spots that could be improved on a large system 
> but memory initialization is by far the biggest.

My feeling is that deferred/on-demand initialization triggered from the 
buddy allocator is the better long term solution.

That will also make it much easier to profile/test memory init 
performance: boot up a large system and run a simple testprogram that 
allocates a lot of RAM.

( It will also make people want to optimize the initialization sequence 
  better, as it will be part of any freshly booted system's memory 
  allocation overhead. )

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux