Re: [PATCH v7] checkpatch: warn for non-standard fixes tag style

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Joe,

Just wanted to check on my misunderstanding below before posting a v8.

On 2022-09-15 11:15:06 +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> 
> On 2022-09-14 09:09:25 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 12:02 +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> > > Add a warning for fixes tags that does not follow community conventions.
> > []
> > > * Changes since v6
> > > - Update first check to make sure that there is a likely SHA1 of some
> > >   minimum length after the fixes line.
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2febb7893346b6234983453de7c037536e479bfc.camel@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> > 
> > The goal here should be to identify a line that looks like a commit
> > reference.
> > 
> > So find lines that starts with 'fixes' and have a SHA1 commit id as
> > broadly as reasonable.
> > 
> > Did you run the grep pattern and look at the results?
> > 
> > One grep pattern to verify the non canonical fixes format that
> > are mistakenly used is:
> > 
> > $ git log --since=5-years-ago --no-merges --grep='^\s*fixes' -i --format=email -P | \
> >   grep -P -i '^\s*fixes' | \
> >   grep -P -v '^Fixes: [0-9a-f]{12,12}\s*\(".*")'
> > 
> > []
> > 
> > There are many different styles.
> > Parenthesea are sometimes not used.
> 
> I understand this, and I did have a look at it.
> 
> > 
> > > +			if ($line =~ /(\s*fixes:?)\s+([0-9a-f]{5,})\s+($balanced_parens)/i) {
> > 
> > How about some pattern like
> > 
> > 	/fixes\s*:?\s*(?:commit:?\s*)?[0-9a-f]{5,}/i
> > 
> > or maybe even more broadly:
> > 
> > 	/fixes\b.*\b[0-9a-f]{5,}\b/i
> 
> Maybe I misunderstand your comment, but this is what I do in this patch?
> 
>     if (!$in_header_lines &&
>         $line =~ /^\s*fixes:?\s*(?:commit\s*)?[0-9a-f]{5,}\b/i) {
> 
>         ...
> 
>         if ($line =~ /(\s*fixes:?)\s+([0-9a-f]{5,})\s+($balanced_parens)/i) {
>             ...
>         }
>     }
> 
> This will catch and warn about such tags but not attempt to break out 
> it's components in order to suggest a potentially more correct fix. Is 
> it this second filter you would like me to change?
> 
> -- 
> Kind Regards,
> Niklas Söderlund

-- 
Kind Regards,
Niklas Söderlund



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux