2022年9月19日(月) 18:20 David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On 17.09.22 09:14, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> > The simple attribute files do not accept a negative value since the
> > commit 488dac0c9237 ("libfs: fix error cast of negative value in
> > simple_attr_write()"), so we can no longer use DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE() to
> > define a file operations for errno value.
> >
> > Fixes: 488dac0c9237 ("libfs: fix error cast of negative value in simple_attr_write()")
> > Reported-by: Zhao Gongyi <zhaogongyi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> But shouldn't we fix simple_attr_write() instead?
>
> I mean, simple_attr_read() might use attr->fmt to print a signed value,
> but simple_attr_write() fails on signed values now?
>
> I might be wrong, but there is a disconnect. I feel like
> simple_attr_write() should similarly make decisions based on attr->fmt.
I agree there is a disconnect, but I have no idea how to fix
simple_attr_write().
(strcmp(attr->fmt, "%%lld\n") is ugly)
If no one seems to come up with a good idea, I'll fix the similar problems
in fault-injection the same way I did here.
