Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Generic PHY Framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:27:20PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 06/18/2013 11:49 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:16:35PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> >> I have already used this API for our MIPI CSI-2/DSIM DPHYs driver,
> >> the RFC patch series can be found at [1].
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Sylwester
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg251666.html
> > 
> > one comment to that series:
> > 
> > let's make the phy names standardized, how about phy-exynos-video-mipi.c
> > or phy-mipi-csi-dsim.c ?
> 
> Yes, I have been thinking about that, wasn't sure exactly what pattern to
> chose. I would make it phy-exynos-mipi-video.c, phy-exynos-dsim-csis.c feels
> a bit odd. phy-mipi-csis-dsim.c might be to generic as MIPI CSIS stands for
> MIPI CSI Slave and MIPI DSIM - MIPI DSI Master. And there might be (actually
> are) IP blocks in an SoC that use the other MIPI Aliance standards.
> For the HDMI PHY I guess just phy-exynos-hdmi.c could be used.

sounds good to me :-)

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux