On 9/14/22 08:36, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote: > When we initially submitted the attestation patches, virt/coco folder > was not created. I initially kept this driver in platform/x86/, but > later moved to arch/x86/coco based on the review comments in v4. There > was a discussion about the need for a new config and the location of > the driver. The outcome of that discussion is, since this is not a > traditional driver, but a basic TDX feature, we don't need a special > config and the code can be maintained in the arch/x86/coco folder. Could you please include the following in this set somewhere: "The code to do the SEV analog of this TDX functionality is in ___insert_path_here____. This code is different from that because ______reason______ so it is instead placed in ____other_path____." ?
