On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:10:14PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: > > Results: > ======= > base = 3.10-rc2 kernel > patched = base + this series > > The test was on 32 core (model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X7560) HT disabled > with 32 KVM guest vcpu 8GB RAM. Have you ever tried to get results with HT enabled? > > +-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+ > ebizzy (records/sec) higher is better > +-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+ > base stdev patched stdev %improvement > +-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+ > 1x 5574.9000 237.4997 5618.0000 94.0366 0.77311 > 2x 2741.5000 561.3090 3332.0000 102.4738 21.53930 > 3x 2146.2500 216.7718 2302.3333 76.3870 7.27237 > 4x 1663.0000 141.9235 1753.7500 83.5220 5.45701 > +-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+ This looks good. Are your ebizzy results consistent run to run though? > +-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+ > dbench (Throughput) higher is better > +-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+ > base stdev patched stdev %improvement > +-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+ > 1x 14111.5600 754.4525 14645.9900 114.3087 3.78718 > 2x 2481.6270 71.2665 2667.1280 73.8193 7.47498 > 3x 1510.2483 31.8634 1503.8792 36.0777 -0.42173 > 4x 1029.4875 16.9166 1039.7069 43.8840 0.99267 > +-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+ Hmm, I wonder what 2.5x looks like. Also, the 3% improvement with no overcommit is interesting. What's happening there? It makes me wonder what < 1x looks like. thanks, drew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
