Hi,
On Saturday 22 June 2013 06:42 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Friday 21 June 2013 07:30 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
On Friday 21 June 2013 06:55 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Thursday 20 June 2013 08:56 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 20 June 2013 08:14 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Have you added the regulator supply entries?
Are you testing on mainline linux-next?
Not in linux-next :-( Tested only with mainline.
Does inverting the order helps?
I think because you do not have entry of supply in your dt node, it gets
ignored by regulator_dev_lookup() and continue.
I made the entry like (added entry form smps10-out2-supply and smps10-in-supply
in dt node) and then it failed.
/***
+ smps10-out2-supply = <&palmas_smps10_out2_reg>;
+ smps10-in-supply = <&tps65090_dcdc3_reg>;
ldo3-in-supply = <&palmas_smps3_reg>;
@@ -903,6 +905,20 @@
regulator-always-on;
};
+ palmas_smps10_out1_reg: smps10_out1 {
+ regulator-name = "smps10_out1";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ };
+
+ palmas_smps10_out2_reg: smps10_out2 {
+ regulator-name = "smps10_out2";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ };
+
**/
After reversing the sequence, it worked fine.
You mean, changing the order in dt node helped?
The sequence on DT does not matter. We register the regulators in the sequence
it is having enums value for regulator-id in loop. So we need to revert there.
Yaah, it looks odd that SMPS10-OUT2come before SMPS10-OUT1 in enums definition.
Will fix that and send a patch.
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
