I have deleted duplicate words like
to, guest, trace, when, we
Signed-off-by: Akhil Raj <lf32.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst | 2 +-
Documentation/RCU/lockdep.rst | 2 +-
Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst | 2 +-
Documentation/trace/histogram.rst | 2 +-
Documentation/trace/timerlat-tracer.rst | 2 +-
Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst | 2 +-
6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
index 42cc5d891bd2..7b1c85a16dc3 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
@@ -477,6 +477,6 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
So if you need to wait for both an RCU grace period and for
all pre-existing call_rcu() callbacks, you will need to execute
both rcu_barrier() and synchronize_rcu(), if necessary, using
- something like workqueues to to execute them concurrently.
+ something like workqueues to execute them concurrently.
See rcubarrier.rst for more information.
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/lockdep.rst b/Documentation/RCU/lockdep.rst
index cc860a0c296b..a94f55991a71 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/lockdep.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/lockdep.rst
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ checking of rcu_dereference() primitives:
rcu_access_pointer(p):
Return the value of the pointer and omit all barriers,
but retain the compiler constraints that prevent duplicating
- or coalescsing. This is useful when when testing the
+ or coalescsing. This is useful when testing the
value of the pointer itself, for example, against NULL.
The rcu_dereference_check() check expression can be any boolean
diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
index 1b0e6711dec9..0ac7ae40be37 100644
--- a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ code field of ``BPF_END``.
The byte swap instructions operate on the destination register
only and do not use a separate source register or immediate value.
-The 1-bit source operand field in the opcode is used to to select what byte
+The 1-bit source operand field in the opcode is used to select what byte
order the operation convert from or to:
========= ===== =================================================
diff --git a/Documentation/trace/histogram.rst b/Documentation/trace/histogram.rst
index 859fd1b76c63..c1b685a38f6b 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace/histogram.rst
+++ b/Documentation/trace/histogram.rst
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ Extended error information
Because the default sort key above is 'hitcount', the above shows a
the list of call_sites by increasing hitcount, so that at the bottom
we see the functions that made the most kmalloc calls during the
- run. If instead we we wanted to see the top kmalloc callers in
+ run. If instead we wanted to see the top kmalloc callers in
terms of the number of bytes requested rather than the number of
calls, and we wanted the top caller to appear at the top, we can use
the 'sort' parameter, along with the 'descending' modifier::
diff --git a/Documentation/trace/timerlat-tracer.rst b/Documentation/trace/timerlat-tracer.rst
index d643c95c01eb..db17df312bc8 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace/timerlat-tracer.rst
+++ b/Documentation/trace/timerlat-tracer.rst
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ For example::
[root@f32 ~]# cd /sys/kernel/tracing/
[root@f32 tracing]# echo timerlat > current_tracer
-It is possible to follow the trace by reading the trace trace file::
+It is possible to follow the trace by reading the trace file::
[root@f32 tracing]# cat trace
# tracer: timerlat
diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst
index 8739120f4300..8364afa228ec 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ Emulating cr0.wp
================
If tdp is not enabled, the host must keep cr0.wp=1 so page write protection
-works for the guest kernel, not guest guest userspace. When the guest
+works for the guest kernel, not guest userspace. When the guest
cr0.wp=1, this does not present a problem. However when the guest cr0.wp=0,
we cannot map the permissions for gpte.u=1, gpte.w=0 to any spte (the
semantics require allowing any guest kernel access plus user read access).
--
2.17.1
