Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] dt-bindings: net: pse-dt: add bindings for generic PSE controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Ok, so current plan is:
> - rename this driver and binding to pse-regulator
> - i will integrate the "ieee802.3-pairs" property, since this driver
>   need to know which field it need to fill in the ethtool response (PSE
>   vs PoDL PSE)

It seems odd to have a property which only purpose is to supply
userspace with some information. If all you have is a single
regulator, does it even matter if it is PSE vs PoDL PSE?

If you think it does matter, i would probably have two compatibles.

   Andrew




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux