On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 3:35 PM Tales <tales.aparecida@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > Em seg., 22 de ago. de 2022 às 17:09, Daniel Latypov > <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:33 PM Tales Aparecida > > <tales.aparecida@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Replace URL with an updated path to the full Documentation page > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tales Aparecida <tales.aparecida@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > lib/overflow_kunit.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/overflow_kunit.c b/lib/overflow_kunit.c > > > index 7e3e43679b73..78075106c0df 100644 > > > --- a/lib/overflow_kunit.c > > > +++ b/lib/overflow_kunit.c > > > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > > > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR MIT > > > /* > > > * Test cases for arithmetic overflow checks. See: > > > - * https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/kunit-tool.html#configuring-building-and-running-tests > > > + * "Running tests with kunit_tool" at Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst > > > > Oh, I thought I had sent a patch out for this. > > The rewritten version of the patch is > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.html > > That's what I was intending to rewrite this line to point to. > > > > But if people like a Documentation/ path to start.rst instead, that also works. > > > > Daniel > > You are absolutely right! You did send and I wasn't aware, sorry. > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220603195626.121922-1-dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx/ > I guess it stalled after that discussion about *where* it should be applied, > I got a green flag in IRC and didn't do my due diligence carefully, > just tried to find pending patches at linux-kselftest which wasn't > CC'd Oh right, it was that series where I didn't cc linux-kselftest. That was my bad, sorry. But I had forgotten to include a patch in that series to update this file still, afaict. I could revive that series and add on a version of this patch, if we want? Daniel
