Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] docs/conf.py: Treat mathjax as fallback math renderer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 11:22:24 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> Currently, math expressions using the "math::" directive or
>> the ":math:" role of Sphinx need the imgmath extension for proper
>> rendering in html and epub builds.
>> imgmath requires dvipng (and latex).
>> Otherwise, "make htmldocs" will complain of missing commands.
>>
>> As a matter of fact, the mathjax extension is loaded by default since
>> Sphinx v1.8 and it is good enough for html docs without any dependency
>> on texlive packages.
>>
>> Stop loading the imgmath extension for html docs unless requirements
>> for imgmath are met.
>>
>> For epub docs, keep the same behavior of always loading imgmath.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Changes sinve v1:
>>  - Acked-by from Mauro
>>
>> --
>>  Documentation/conf.py | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/conf.py b/Documentation/conf.py
>> index 934727e23e0e..3ec1f845c839 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/conf.py
>> +++ b/Documentation/conf.py
>> @@ -15,6 +15,23 @@
>>  import sys
>>  import os
>>  import sphinx
>> +from subprocess import check_output
>> +
>> +# helper
>> +# ------
>> +
>> +def have_command(cmd, ver_opt, str_in_ver):
>> +    """Run ```cmd`` with ``ver_opt`` and see if ``str_in_ver`` is found
>> +    or not.
>> +    """
>> +
>> +    try:
>> +        ver_str = check_output([cmd, ver_opt]).decode('utf-8', 'ignore')
>> +        have_cmd = str_in_ver in ver_str
>> +    except:
>> +        have_cmd = False
>> +
>> +    return have_cmd
> 
> So this is adding infrastructure that isn't really mentioned in the
> changelog.
Sorry for missing it.

> 
> A more fundamental comment, though, is that I have learned (the hard
> way, repeatedly) that good things do not come from bare "except"
> statements.  They always hide bugs.  If there is an exception you're
> worried about here, please list it explicitly.
I see.  Thank you for the insightful tip.

I'm more inclined to use the simpler approach of the "which()" function
defined in sphinx/kfigure.py, which is free of try-except constructs.

Will respin this along with the fix of 2/3 in a couple of days.

        Thanks, Akira

> 
> Otherwise seems good.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jon



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux