On 2022/8/11 01:27, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 11:25:07AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> How about just cgroup.pressure? Too ambiguous?
>>
>> cgroup.pressure.enable sounds good to me too. Or, because it's
>> default-enabled and that likely won't change, cgroup.pressure.disable.
>
> .disable sounds more logical but I like .enable better for some reason. As
> for just cgroup.pressure, yeah, maybe? The conundrum is that the prettiness
> order is the exact reverse of the logical order. So, I'm okay with any of
> the three.
Ok, so I would like to pick the prettiest "cgroup.pressure", it also looks more
consistent with {cpu|memory|io}.pressure.
Thanks!
