On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 19:49:23 +0200
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 7/31/22 19:01, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > static int da_monitor_init_##name(void) \
> > { \
> > int slot; \
> > \
> > slot = rv_get_task_monitor_slot(); <- if this returns positive, things break \
> > if (slot < 0 || slot >= RV_PER_TASK_MONITOR_INIT) \
> >
> > And we probably need slot to be negative if it is greater or equal to RV_PER_TASK_MONITOR_INIT.
> >
> > return slot; \
> >
>
> ok, there will be a problem when RV_PER_TASK_MONITOR_INIT changes to > 1. This will need to be patched to
> return negative. So far we have only one because there is only one per task monitor.
>
Exactly. And reviewers like Tao and myself are going to continue to
flag it as a bug as we don't assume that RV_PER_TASK_MONITOR_INIT will
stay 1 ;-)
-- Steve
