On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 17:56:27 +0200 Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yeah, this is not that clear from my above words expression. I said the return > > value of da_monitor_init_*() will be 0, but it is not right. Global and per-cpu > > monitor will return 0, per-task monitor may return a positive value when the > > slot is equal or greater than RV_PER_TASK_MONITOR_INIT(how possible this will > > happen I do know yet). This is from reading the current code implementation. > > I just want to say that there may be a bug here. > > goto my previous email; If you increment RV_PER_TASK_MONITORS to 2, I believe Tao is correct. -- Steve
