On 26/07/2022 10:37, Xianting Tian wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe Ah I see you've already sent a v4. > > Changes v1 -> v2: > 1, remove the patch "Add a fast call path of crash_kexec()" from this series > of patches, as it already applied to riscv git. > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=3f1901110a89b0e2e13adb2ac8d1a7102879ea98 > 2, add 'Reviewed-by' based on the comments of v1. > Changes v2 -> v3: > use "riscv" instead of "riscv64" in patch 5 subject line. > Changes v3 -> v4: > use "riscv" instead of "riscv64" in the summary of patch 5 subject line. There's no need to respin a series for the sake 3 characters in the cover letter (so sorry if you misunderstood me!)... > > Xianting Tian (5): > RISC-V: use __smp_processor_id() instead of smp_processor_id() > RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support > riscv: Add modules to virtual kernel memory layout dump > RISC-V: Fixup getting correct current pc > riscv: crash_core: Export kernel vm layout, phys_ram_base ...but it would've been good to align these to either "riscv:" or "RISC-V:" & not mix the two in a series. Don't do this right away, it is okay to wait for more significant changes before sending out a new version as this sort of thing could easily be changed when being applied. Thanks, Conor.
