On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 06:38, Yicong Yang <yangyicong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2022/7/8 0:20, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 07:43:21PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote: > >> On 2022/7/7 1:57, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I have started looking at this set. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 07:55:54PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote: > >>>> Document the introduction and usage of HiSilicon PTT device driver. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> --- > >>>> Documentation/trace/hisi-ptt.rst | 307 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>>> Documentation/trace/index.rst | 1 + > >>> > >>> The "get_maintainer" script clearly indicates that Jonathan Corbet maintains the > >>> Documentation directory and yet he is not CC'ed on this patch, nor is the > >>> linux-doc mainling list. As such, it would not be possible to merge this > >>> patchset. > >>> > >> > >> sorry for missing. +cc'ed. > >> > >>>> 2 files changed, 308 insertions(+) > >>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/hisi-ptt.rst > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/hisi-ptt.rst b/Documentation/trace/hisi-ptt.rst > >>>> new file mode 100644 > >>>> index 000000000000..0a3112244d40 > >>>> --- /dev/null > >>>> +++ b/Documentation/trace/hisi-ptt.rst > >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,307 @@ > >>>> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > >>>> + > >>>> +====================================== > >>>> +HiSilicon PCIe Tune and Trace device > >>>> +====================================== > >>>> + > >>>> +Introduction > >>>> +============ > >>>> + > >>>> +HiSilicon PCIe tune and trace device (PTT) is a PCIe Root Complex > >>>> +integrated Endpoint (RCiEP) device, providing the capability > >>>> +to dynamically monitor and tune the PCIe link's events (tune), > >>>> +and trace the TLP headers (trace). The two functions are independent, > >>>> +but is recommended to use them together to analyze and enhance the > >>>> +PCIe link's performance. > >>>> + > >>>> +On Kunpeng 930 SoC, the PCIe Root Complex is composed of several > >>>> +PCIe cores. Each PCIe core includes several Root Ports and a PTT > >>>> +RCiEP, like below. The PTT device is capable of tuning and > >>>> +tracing the links of the PCIe core. > >>>> +:: > >>>> + > >>>> + +--------------Core 0-------+ > >>>> + | | [ PTT ] | > >>>> + | | [Root Port]---[Endpoint] > >>>> + | | [Root Port]---[Endpoint] > >>>> + | | [Root Port]---[Endpoint] > >>>> + Root Complex |------Core 1-------+ > >>>> + | | [ PTT ] | > >>>> + | | [Root Port]---[ Switch ]---[Endpoint] > >>>> + | | [Root Port]---[Endpoint] `-[Endpoint] > >>>> + | | [Root Port]---[Endpoint] > >>>> + +---------------------------+ > >>>> + > >>>> +The PTT device driver registers one PMU device for each PTT device. > >>>> +The name of each PTT device is composed of 'hisi_ptt' prefix with > >>>> +the id of the SICL and the Core where it locates. The Kunpeng 930 > >>>> +SoC encapsulates multiple CPU dies (SCCL, Super CPU Cluster) and > >>>> +IO dies (SICL, Super I/O Cluster), where there's one PCIe Root > >>>> +Complex for each SICL. > >>>> +:: > >>>> + > >>>> + /sys/devices/hisi_ptt<sicl_id>_<core_id> > >>> > >>> All entries added to sysfs should have corresponding documentation. See [1] and > >>> [2] for details and [3] for an example. > >>> > >>> [1]. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/ABI/README > >>> [2]. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/ABI/testing > >>> [3]. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-etm4x > >>> > >> > >> ok. I'll add a patch for ABI description. Thanks for the reference. > >> > >>>> + > >>>> +Tune > >>>> +==== > >>>> + > >>>> +PTT tune is designed for monitoring and adjusting PCIe link parameters (events). > >>>> +Currently we support events in 4 classes. The scope of the events > >>>> +covers the PCIe core to which the PTT device belongs. > >>>> + > >>>> +Each event is presented as a file under $(PTT PMU dir)/tune, and > >>>> +a simple open/read/write/close cycle will be used to tune the event. > >>>> +:: > >>>> + > >>>> + $ cd /sys/devices/hisi_ptt<sicl_id>_<core_id>/tune > >>>> + $ ls > >>>> + qos_tx_cpl qos_tx_np qos_tx_p > >>>> + tx_path_rx_req_alloc_buf_level > >>>> + tx_path_tx_req_alloc_buf_level > >>> > >>> These look overly long... How about watermark_rx and watermark_tx? > >>> > >> > >> These are gotten from the hardware manual and abbreviated. These events are highly connected > >> to the hardware desgin so I think it's better to keep consistence. The watermark_{rx, tx} will > >> become ambigious when we add more events for Rx path or other Tx path events. > >> > >> The event code is composed of two parts. First part (tx_path) describes which path it belongs to > >> and second part describes the function ({rx,tx}_req_alloc_buf_level). We called the link path > >> between CPU and PCIe RC as Rx path and the path between PCIe RC to the PCIe link as Tx path. > >> So we need to have tx_path prefix for the Tx path and {rx, tx}_req_alloc_buf_level for the > >> requested watermark of {inbound, outbound} buffer allocation. Indeed we have other Tx path > >> buffer events which are not exported in this series. > >> > > > > I will not be maintaining nor using this driver so the choice is entirely yours. > > That being said the end result is the same - those names are, in my opinion, too > > long. > > > >> > >>>> + $ cat qos_tx_dp > >>>> + 1 > >>>> + $ echo 2 > qos_tx_dp > >>>> + $ cat qos_tx_dp > >>>> + 2 > >>>> + > >>>> +Current value (numerical value) of the event can be simply read > >>>> +from the file, and the desired value written to the file to tune. > >>>> + > >>>> +1. Tx path QoS control > >>>> +------------------------ > >>>> + > >>>> +The following files are provided to tune the QoS of the tx path of > >>>> +the PCIe core. > >>>> + > >>>> +- qos_tx_cpl: weight of Tx completion TLPs > >>>> +- qos_tx_np: weight of Tx non-posted TLPs > >>>> +- qos_tx_p: weight of Tx posted TLPs > >>>> + > >>>> +The weight influences the proportion of certain packets on the PCIe link. > >>>> +For example, for the storage scenario, increase the proportion > >>>> +of the completion packets on the link to enhance the performance as > >>>> +more completions are consumed. > >>>> + > >>>> +The available tune data of these events is [0, 1, 2]. > >>>> +Writing a negative value will return an error, and out of range > >>>> +values will be converted to 2. Note that the event value just > >>>> +indicates a probable level, but is not precise. > >>>> + > >>>> +2. Tx path buffer control > >>>> +------------------------- > >>>> + > >>>> +Following files are provided to tune the buffer of tx path of the PCIe core. > >>>> + > >>>> +- tx_path_rx_req_alloc_buf_level: watermark of Rx requested > >>>> +- tx_path_tx_req_alloc_buf_level: watermark of Tx requested > >>>> + > >>>> +These events influence the watermark of the buffer allocated for each > >>>> +type. Rx means the inbound while Tx means outbound. The packets will > >>>> +be stored in the buffer first and then transmitted either when the > >>>> +watermark reached or when timed out. For a busy direction, you should > >>>> +increase the related buffer watermark to avoid frequently posting and > >>>> +thus enhance the performance. In most cases just keep the default value. > >>>> + > >>>> +The available tune data of above events is [0, 1, 2]. > >>>> +Writing a negative value will return an error, and out of range > >>>> +values will be converted to 2. Note that the event value just > >>>> +indicates a probable level, but is not precise. > >>> > >>> This is useful documentation but it also should be found in the ABI > >>> documentation referred to above. > >>> > >>>> + > >>>> +Trace > >>>> +===== > >>>> + > >>>> +PTT trace is designed for dumping the TLP headers to the memory, which > >>>> +can be used to analyze the transactions and usage condition of the PCIe > >>>> +Link. You can choose to filter the traced headers by either requester ID, > >>>> +or those downstream of a set of Root Ports on the same core of the PTT > >>>> +device. It's also supported to trace the headers of certain type and of > >>>> +certain direction. > >>>> + > >>>> +You can use the perf command `perf record` to set the parameters, start > >>>> +trace and get the data. It's also supported to decode the trace > >>>> +data with `perf report`. The control parameters for trace is inputted > >>>> +as event code for each events, which will be further illustrated later. > >>>> +An example usage is like > >>>> +:: > >>>> + > >>>> + $ perf record -e hisi_ptt0_2/filter=0x80001,type=1,direction=1, > >>>> + format=1/ -- sleep 5 > >>>> + > >>>> +This will trace the TLP headers downstream root port 0000:00:10.1 (event > >>>> +code for event 'filter' is 0x80001) with type of posted TLP requests, > >>>> +direction of inbound and traced data format of 8DW. > >>>> + > >>>> +1. filter > >>>> +--------- > >>>> + > >>>> +The TLP headers to trace can be filtered by the Root Ports or the requester > >>>> +ID of the endpoints, which are located on the same core of the PTT device. > >>>> +You can set the filter by specifying the `filter` parameter which is required > >>>> +to start the trace. The parameter value is 20 bit. The supported filters and > >>>> +related values are outputted through `available_root_port_filters` and > >>>> +`available_requester_filters` sysfs attributes for Root Ports and Requesters > >>>> +respectively. > >>>> +:: > >>>> + > >>>> + $ cat available_root_port_filters > >>>> + 0000:00:10.0 0x80001 > >>>> + 0000:00:11.0 0x80004 > >>>> + $ cat available_requester_filters > >>>> + 0000:01:00.0 0x00100 > >>>> + 0000:01:00.1 0x00101 > >>> > >>> If I remember correctly, one of the rule for sysfs is one line per entry. > >>> > >> > >> Since one PTT devices may support several Root Ports and Endpoints on its core, I find no better > >> way to make this information convenient and easy to use for the users to collect. So maybe this > >> canbe an exception and there seems to have some limited examples like > >> /sys/devices/system/node/node<N>/{meminfo, vmstat, meminfo}. > > > > You can either find a better solution or argue the matter with Greg. I suggest > > to introduce new directories, i.e "root_port_filters" and "requested_filters" > > and under those have entries like "port0", "port1" and so on. > > > > Thanks for the suggestion and it does make sense to me. But I've tried it and met some problems. > I intended to create two attribute groups for each kind of filter and create attribute for each > available filter. like: > > $ ls root_port_filters # each filter exists as an sysfs attribute > 0000:00:10.0 0000:00:11.0 > $ cat root_port_filters/0000:00:10.0 # read the attribute get the filter value > 0x80001 > > In pratice we may have no filter for certain types, for example no endpoint found on this PCIe > core then we'll have no filter attributes under requester_filters directory. Or if endpoint > devices are hot removed or manually removed through sysfs by the user, the filter attributes > will be created/destroyed dynamically (will support following this series, an implementation > will be like in [1]) which may make the directory empty. But sysfs won't allow to have an > empty attribute group, restricted in [2]. > My comment was not meant to provide a solution but to highlight alternative options. There are a lot of sysfs examples in the kernel for you to look at. > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220407125841.3678-4-yangyicong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > [2] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/5cf3bb0d3a2d0de94f3f551f0e4211068818aabf/fs/sysfs/group.c#L121 > > >> > >>>> + > >>>> +Note that multiple Root Ports can be specified at one time, but only > >>>> +one Endpoint function can be specified in one trace. Specifying both > >>>> +Root Port and function at the same time is not supported. > >>>> + > >>>> +If no filter is available, reading the related filter sysfs attribute > >>>> +will get an empty string. > >>>> +:: > >>>> + > >>>> + $ cat available_root_port_filters > >>>> + > >>>> + $ cat available_requester_filters > >>> > >>> Those too look overly long, and where to find them is not documented. As such > >>> users have to guest that it must be somewhere under > >>> /sys/devices/hisi_ptt<sicl_id>_<core_id>/. > >>> > >> > >> Since Root Port and Requester are PCIe terminologies so it's better to have them > >> embedded to make it clear. Maybe 'available' can be removed. > >> > >> Will have all these sysfs attributes documented. > >> > >>> More comments tomorrow. > >>> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Yicong > > . > >