On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:30:00AM +0200, Juan David Gonzalez Cobas wrote: > Hi all, > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Alessandro Rubini <rubini@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [...] > > > > Yes, it was intended. I don't think it's an issue for merging, but > I understand you've seen so many such undesired copy-paste errors. > > > CERN policies favour GPLv3 as default open source license as a recommendation. > The "GPLv2 or later" is, in effect, intentional. Ok, thanks for verifying this. > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(fmc_driver_unregister); > > > > Any specific reason these aren't EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()? > > > > Again, just have to ask. > > I think we want to allow for proprietary FMC drivers. I personally > don't feel this is a core kernel technology. But I'll let David Cobas > expand on CERN policies, as I'm only a consultant. > > > CERN policies (mostly recommendations) concern esp. the return of > investment of taxpayer money to society. In view of the potential use > cases of FMC, EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL would better serve that > purpose than merely allowing proprietary modules, so GPL exports > are fine. Great. Alessandro, care to respin the patches that I didn't apply and resend them so that I can? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
