Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] devlink: introduce framework for selftests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 06:20:22PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu,  7 Jul 2022 23:59:48 +0530 Vikas Gupta wrote:
> >  static const struct genl_small_ops devlink_nl_ops[] = {
> > @@ -9361,6 +9493,18 @@ static const struct genl_small_ops devlink_nl_ops[] = {
> >  		.doit = devlink_nl_cmd_trap_policer_set_doit,
> >  		.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
> >  	},
> > +	{
> > +		.cmd = DEVLINK_CMD_SELFTESTS_SHOW,
> > +		.validate = GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_STRICT | GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_DUMP,
> 
> I think we can validate strict for new commands, so no validation flags
> needed.
> 
> > +		.doit = devlink_nl_cmd_selftests_show,
> 
> What about dump? Listing all tests on all devices?
> 
> > +		.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,

Related to Jakub's question, is there a reason that the show command
requires 'GENL_ADMIN_PERM' ?

> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.cmd = DEVLINK_CMD_SELFTESTS_RUN,
> > +		.validate = GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_STRICT | GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_DUMP,
> > +		.doit = devlink_nl_cmd_selftests_run,
> > +		.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
> > +	},
> >  };
> >  
> >  static struct genl_family devlink_nl_family __ro_after_init = {
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux