Re: [PATCH V4 01/20] rv: Add Runtime Verification (RV) interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey Tao!

On 7/6/22 19:49, Tao Zhou wrote:
>> +static void *enabled_monitors_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
>> +{
>> +	struct rv_monitor_def *m_def;
>> +	loff_t l;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&rv_interface_lock);
>> +	m_def = list_entry(&rv_monitors_list, struct rv_monitor_def, list);
> I realized this m_def is not real but vain. Is it possible the loop is
> skiped and just return m_def that is not valid.

that is empty... not a problem.

I am not seeing (the possible) problem here. Could you simulate/reproduce the problem?

Btw, this code is "inspired" (iow stolen) from trace_events.c.

Am I missing something? steve?

>> +	for (l = 0; l <= *pos; ) {
>> +		m_def = enabled_monitors_next(m, m_def, &l);
>> +		if (!m_def)
>> +			break;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return m_def;
>> +}

-- Daniel



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux