Re: [PATCH v3] doc/checkpatch: Add description to MACRO_ARG_REUSE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 1:00 AM Martin Fernandez
<martin.fernandez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add a description, an example and a possible workaround to the
> MACRO_ARG_REUSE check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Fernandez <martin.fernandez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
> index b52452bc2963..86545c65cf7b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
> @@ -759,6 +759,26 @@ Indentation and Line Breaks
>  Macros, Attributes and Symbols
>  ------------------------------
>
> +  **ARG_REUSE**

The name of this checkpatch type is actually "MACRO_ARG_REUSE".

> +    Using the same argument multiple times in the macro definition
> +    would lead to unwanted side-effects.

how about "... may lead to unwanted side effects"?

Rationale: it does only lead to side effects if there are multiple
computations involved.

just on spelling:
s/side-effects/side effects/

> +
> +    For example, given a `min` macro defined like::
> +
> +      #define min(x, y)  ((x) < (y) ? (x) : (y))
> +
> +    If you call it with `min(foo(x), 0)`, it would expand to::
> +
> +      foo(x) < 0 ? foo(x) : 0
> +
> +    If `foo` has side-effects or it's an expensive calculation the
> +    results might not be what the user intended.
> +

s/side-effects/side effects/

> +    For a workaround the idea is to define local variables to hold the
> +    macro's arguments. Checkout the actual implementation of `min` in
> +    include/linux/minmax.h for the full implementation of the
> +    workaround.
> +

I ran checkpatch on all commits from v5.17..v5.18 and looked for all
check warnings with MACRO_ARG_REUSE.

There were 35 warnings in 15 commits, touching 16 different files (4
in drivers/staging, 5 in drivers/net/wireless/, 5 in
drivers/net/ethernet/, 1 in drivers/net/dsa/, 1 in drivers/net/can/).

As far as I see it from those commits, the more common way to address
this is to check that a macro is only used locally in some file and
that all uses of that macro pass a constant value as macro argument.

Maybe we add these two as equally good alternatives?

Lukas


>    **ARRAY_SIZE**
>      The ARRAY_SIZE(foo) macro should be preferred over
>      sizeof(foo)/sizeof(foo[0]) for finding number of elements in an
> --
> 2.30.2
>



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux