On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 01:02:21AM +0800, Tianyu Lan wrote: > > Can we reorder that initialization? Because I really hate having > > to have an arch hook in every architecture. > > How about using "flags" parameter of swiotlb_init() to pass area number > or add new parameter for area number? > > I just reposted patch 1 since there is just some coding style issue and area > number may also set via swiotlb kernel parameter. We still need figure out a > good solution to pass area number from architecture code. What is the problem with calling swiotlb_init after nr_possible_cpus() works?
