Hi,
On Tuesday 18 June 2013 03:57 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 03:34:36PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
On Tuesday 18 June 2013 03:14 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 02:13:55PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
In order for controllers to get PHY in case of non dt boot, the phy
binding information (phy device name) should be added in the platform
data of the controller.
Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx>
I would rather not pass strings around, any other way to handle this ?
Why do you need to pass this string ?
Our old way of binding the controller and the phy using device name
started creating problems after the devices are created using
PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO. Infact non-dt boot is broken in mainline for
OMAP3 platforms for which I have posted a RFC series
http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?12,708632 which also uses
strings.
I'm not sure of any other way to deal with this.
have you checked how other frameworks handle it ? Regulator has some
sort of binding in board-files, but I guess it passes the regulator
name?
From whatever I could make of, regulator has 3 ways to get the
regulator one of which is using the binding in board-files (but it also
uses device name which could create the same problem that we are facing).
1.) from dt data
2.) from _supply_ name
3.) from binding in board file
(referred regulator_dev_lookup() in regulator/core.c)
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
