> On 28 Jun 2022, at 11:04, Alex Shi <seakeel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> 导致的缓存行跳跃（cacheline bouncing）这种昂贵的开销？ >>> Both look fine. and may we don't have a better way to reflect the fact >>> cache bouncing between cpus? >> >> how about cpu核间缓存行弹跳? > > Uh, is the following better? > 导致的(CPU核间)缓存行回弹（cacheline bouncing）这种昂贵的开销 > Seems much better. I will take this advice. Thanks, Yizhou > Thanks > Alex
