Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] libata-scsi: Cap ata_device->max_sectors according to shost->max_sectors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/28/22 00:25, John Garry wrote:
> ATA devices (struct ata_device) have a max_sectors field which is
> configured internally in libata. This is then used to (re)configure the
> associated sdev request queue max_sectors value from how it is earlier set
> in __scsi_init_queue(). In __scsi_init_queue() the max_sectors value is set
> according to shost limits, which includes host DMA mapping limits.
> 
> Cap the ata_device max_sectors according to shost->max_sectors to respect
> this shost limit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Nit: please change the patch title to "ata: libata-scsi: Cap ..."

> ---
>  drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index 86dbb1cdfabd..24a43d540d9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -1060,6 +1060,7 @@ int ata_scsi_dev_config(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct ata_device *dev)
>  		dev->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_NO_UNLOAD;
>  
>  	/* configure max sectors */
> +	dev->max_sectors = min(dev->max_sectors, sdev->host->max_sectors);
>  	blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(q, dev->max_sectors);
>  
>  	if (dev->class == ATA_DEV_ATAPI) {


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux