Re: [Part1 PATCH v5 10/22] x86, mm, numa: Move two functions calling on successful path later

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

Does the subject match the patch content?  What two functions?  The
patch is separating out the actual registration part so that the
discovery part can happen earlier, right?

> Currently, parsing numa info needs to allocate some buffer and need to be
> called after init_mem_mapping. So try to split parsing numa info procedure
> into two steps:
> 	- The first step will be called before init_mem_mapping, and it
> 	  should not need allocate buffers.

Document the requirement somewhere in the source code?

> 	- The second step will cantain all the buffer related code and be
> 	  executed later.
> 
> At last we will have early_initmem_init() and initmem_init().

Do you mean "eventually" or "in the end" by "at last"?

> This patch implements only the first step.
> 
> setup_node_data() and numa_init_array() are only called for successful
> path, so we can move these two callings to x86_numa_init(). That will also
> make numa_init() smaller and more readable.

I find the description somewhat difficult to follow.  :(

> -v2: remove online_node_map clear in numa_init(), as it is only
>      set in setup_node_data() at last in successful path.

I don't get this.  What prevents specific numa init functions (numaq,
x86_acpi, amd...) from updating node_online_map?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux