Simon Horman <simon.horman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Correct a typo in the description of interaction between > the TCM and MMU. > > Found by inspection. > > Signed-off-by: Louis Peens <louis.peens@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Here too I have to ask: what does this signoff chain mean? If two developers were needed for a single-character typo fix, then a Co-developed-by line is appropriate. If you are forwarding a patch from Louis, then a From: line to get the authorship right is indicated ... ? > Documentation/arm/tcm.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/arm/tcm.rst b/Documentation/arm/tcm.rst > index b256f9783883..1dc6c39220f9 100644 > --- a/Documentation/arm/tcm.rst > +++ b/Documentation/arm/tcm.rst > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ CPU so it is usually wise not to overlap any physical RAM with > the TCM. > > The TCM memory can then be remapped to another address again using > -the MMU, but notice that the TCM if often used in situations where > +the MMU, but notice that the TCM is often used in situations where > the MMU is turned off. To avoid confusion the current Linux > implementation will map the TCM 1 to 1 from physical to virtual Thanks, jon
