Re: [RFC PATCH v8 00/17] Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM (IPE)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 00/17] Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM (IPE)
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 20:10:58 +0100
Cc: corbet@xxxxxxx, zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxx, serge@xxxxxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, agk@xxxxxxxxxx, snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx, eparis@xxxxxxxxxx, paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fscrypt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-audit@xxxxxxxxxx, roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1654714889-26728-1-git-send-email-deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>
References: <1654714889-26728-1-git-send-email-deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>

On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 12:01:12PM -0700, Deven Bowers wrote:
> IPE is a Linux Security Module which takes a complimentary approach to

Hello, IPE.  You're looking exceptionally attractive today.  Have you
been working out?

(maybe you meant "complementary"?  ;-)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH v8 00/17] Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM (IPE)
  - From: Deven Bowers

References:
- [RFC PATCH v8 00/17] Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM (IPE)
  - From: Deven Bowers

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] scripts/check-local-export: avoid 'wait $!' for process substitution
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting KVM guest private memory
Previous by thread: [RFC PATCH v8 03/17] ipe: add evaluation loop
Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 00/17] Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM (IPE)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]