Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] linux/types.h: Remove unnecessary __bitwise__

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15. 03. 22, 16:30, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>

There are no users of "__bitwise__" except the definition of "__bitwise".
Remove __bitwise__ and define __bitwise directly.

This is a follow-up to 05de97003c77 ("linux/types.h: enable endian checks
for all sparse builds").

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  include/uapi/linux/types.h  | 5 ++---
  tools/include/linux/types.h | 5 ++---
  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/types.h b/include/uapi/linux/types.h
index f6d2f83cbe29..71696f424ac8 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/types.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/types.h
@@ -20,11 +20,10 @@
   */
#ifdef __CHECKER__
-#define __bitwise__ __attribute__((bitwise))
+#define __bitwise	__attribute__((bitwise))
  #else
-#define __bitwise__
+#define __bitwise
  #endif
-#define __bitwise __bitwise__

Hi,

this broke userspace, like open-iscsi:
[   34s] In file included from session_info.h:9,
[   34s]                  from iscsi_util.c:38:
[   34s] ../include/iscsi_proto.h:66:30: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'itt_t'
[   34s]    66 | typedef uint32_t __bitwise__ itt_t;
[   34s]       |                              ^~~~~

It looks like we need __bitwise__ back.

thanks,
--
js
suse labs



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux