On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 4:45 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 03:50:34PM -0700, Yosry Ahmed wrote: > > I think it might be useful to have a dedicated entry in memory.stat > > for proactively reclaimed memory. A case where this would be useful is > > tuning and evaluating userspace proactive reclaimers. For instance, if > > a userspace agent is asking the kernel to reclaim 100M, but it could > > only reclaim 10M, then most probably the proactive reclaimer is not > > using a good methodology to figure out how much memory do we need to > > reclaim. > > > > IMO this is more useful, and a superset of just reading the last > > reclaim request status through memory.reclaim (read stat before and > > after). > > +1 It might also be useful to have a breakdown of this by memory type: file, anon, or shrinkers. It would also fit in nicely with a potential type=file/anon/shrinker argument to memory.reclaim. Thoughts on this?
