On Sun, May 22 2022 at 16:47, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 04:37:19PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 03 2021 at 16:29, Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> While I agree that we want to keep the number of licenses as small as
>> possible, we cannot really dictate which dual licensing options a
>> submitter selects unless the license is GPL-2.0-only incompatible, which
>> copyleft-next is not.
>>
>> Can we just get over this, add the license with the SPDX identifier and
>> move on?
>
> From what I recall, I had technical reasons I didn't take this series,
> but that was a long time ago and I would be glad to review it again if
> it were rebased and resubmitted after the next merge window is closed.
The license addition and the SPDX identifier cleanup should be seperated
from the new test code which was part of the series.
Thanks,
tglx
