Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation/barriers: Add memory barrier dma_mb()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2022/5/20 18:08, Marco Elver wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 11:15AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
The memory barrier dma_mb() is introduced by commit a76a37777f2c
("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ensure queue is read after updating prod pointer"),
which is used to ensure that prior (both reads and writes) accesses to
memory by a CPU are ordered w.r.t. a subsequent MMIO write.

Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 5 ++++-
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index b12df9137e1c..1eabcc0e4eca 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -1894,10 +1894,13 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions:
(*) dma_wmb();
   (*) dma_rmb();
+ (*) dma_mb();
These are for use with consistent memory to guarantee the ordering
       of writes or reads of shared memory accessible to both the CPU and a
-     DMA capable device.
+     DMA capable device, in the case of ensure the prior (both reads and
+     writes) accesses to memory by a CPU are ordered w.r.t. a subsequent
+     MMIO write, dma_mb().
I think this is out of place; this explanation here is not yet
elaborating on either. Elaboration on dma_mb() should go where
dma_rmb() and dma_wmb() are explained.

Something like this:

------ >8 ------

diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index b12df9137e1c..fb322b6cce70 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -1894,6 +1894,7 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions:
(*) dma_wmb();
   (*) dma_rmb();
+ (*) dma_mb();
These are for use with consistent memory to guarantee the ordering
       of writes or reads of shared memory accessible to both the CPU and a
@@ -1925,11 +1926,11 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions:
       The dma_rmb() allows us guarantee the device has released ownership
       before we read the data from the descriptor, and the dma_wmb() allows
       us to guarantee the data is written to the descriptor before the device
-     can see it now has ownership.  Note that, when using writel(), a prior
-     wmb() is not needed to guarantee that the cache coherent memory writes
-     have completed before writing to the MMIO region.  The cheaper
-     writel_relaxed() does not provide this guarantee and must not be used
-     here.
+     can see it now has ownership.  The dma_mb() implies both a dma_rmb() and a
+     dma_wmb().  Note that, when using writel(), a prior wmb() is not needed to
+     guarantee that the cache coherent memory writes have completed before
+     writing to the MMIO region.  The cheaper writel_relaxed() does not provide
+     this guarantee and must not be used here.
See the subsection "Kernel I/O barrier effects" for more information on
       relaxed I/O accessors and the Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst file for

------ >8 ------
Thanks, will use above explanation.
Also, now that you're making dma_mb() part of the official API, it might
need a generic definition in include/asm-generic/barrier.h, because
as-is it's only available in arm64 builds.

Ok, it's good to add the dma_mb() and __dma_mb  definition with a separate patch

into include/asm-generic/barrier.h.


Thoughts?

Thanks,
-- Marco
.



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux