On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 12:14 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 19:46, Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 10:12 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 10 May 2022 at 22:26, Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:39 PM Jessica Zhang > > > > <quic_jesszhan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/10/2022 7:13 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > > > > > > And use it to store expectations about what the drm/msm driver is > > > > > > supposed to pass in the IGT test suite. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also include a configuration file that points to the out-of-tree CI > > > > > > scripts. > > > > > > > > > > > > By storing the test expectations along the code we can make sure both > > > > > > stay in sync with each other, and so we can know when a code change > > > > > > breaks those expectations. > > > > > > > > > > > > This will allow all contributors to drm/msm to reuse the infrastructure > > > > > > already in gitlab.freedesktop.org to test the driver on several > > > > > > generations of the hardware. > > > > > > > > > > > > v2: > > > > > > - Fix names of result expectation files to match SoC > > > > > > - Don't execute tests that are going to skip on all boards > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Documentation/gpu/msm_automated_testing.rst | 70 +++++++++ > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/gitlab-ci.yml | 11 ++ > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm.testlist | 148 ++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > .../gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_apq8016_results.txt | 140 +++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > .../gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_apq8096_results.txt | 140 +++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_sc7180_results.txt | 141 +++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_sdm845_results.txt | 141 +++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > 7 files changed, 791 insertions(+) > > > > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/gpu/msm_automated_testing.rst > > > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/gitlab-ci.yml > > > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm.testlist > > > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_apq8016_results.txt > > > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_apq8096_results.txt > > > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_sc7180_results.txt > > > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_sdm845_results.txt > > > > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_sc7180_results.txt b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_sc7180_results.txt > > > > > > new file mode 100644 > > > > > > index 000000000000..01f7b4b399b5 > > > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_sc7180_results.txt > > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ > > > > > > +igt@core_auth@getclient-simple,dmesg-warn > > > > > > +igt@core_auth@getclient-master-drop,pass > > > > > > +igt@core_auth@basic-auth,pass > > > > > > +igt@core_auth@many-magics,pass > > > > > > +igt@core_getclient,pass > > > > > > +igt@core_getstats,pass > > > > > > +igt@core_getversion,pass > > > > > > +igt@core_setmaster_vs_auth,pass > > > > > > +igt@drm_read@invalid-buffer,pass > > > > > > +igt@drm_read@fault-buffer,pass > > > > > > +igt@drm_read@empty-block,pass > > > > > > +igt@drm_read@empty-nonblock,pass > > > > > > +igt@drm_read@short-buffer-block,pass > > > > > > +igt@drm_read@short-buffer-nonblock,pass > > > > > > +igt@drm_read@short-buffer-wakeup,pass > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@unused-handle,pass > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@unused-pitches,pass > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@unused-offsets,pass > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@unused-modifier,pass > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@legacy-format,dmesg-warn > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@no-handle,pass > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@basic,pass > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@bad-pitch-0,pass > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@bad-pitch-32,pass > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@bad-pitch-63,pass > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@bad-pitch-128,pass > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@bad-pitch-256,pass > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@bad-pitch-1024,pass > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@bad-pitch-999,pass > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@bad-pitch-65536,pass > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@size-max,pass > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@too-wide,pass > > > > > > +igt@kms_addfb_basic@too-high,dmesg-warn > > > > > > > > > > For test results on Trogdor, is is possible to have them be > > > > > success/fail/skip only? > > > > > > > > > > Results such as dmesg-warn/dmesg-fail are igt_runner specific and > > > > > because there isn't support for igt_runner on ChromeOS, they will be > > > > > difficult to replicate and debug. > > > > > > > > Actually, I wonder if it would be better to just treat > > > > dmesg-warn/dmesg-fail as pass/fail? I'd noticed some flakes on > > > > rockchip which looked just like unrelated dmesg msg which just > > > > happened to show up while the test was running. > > > > > > This is kinda the reason behind standardizing on drm dmesg logging, so > > > that we have some chances at filtering stuff out. Not sure that's a > > > good idea, since when your entire box splats and lockdep is dead, then > > > continuing to run drm tests is still fairly pointless. > > > > I'm not sure if we are using it yet for drm-ci, but for mesa-ci we > > monitor dmesg (over serial port, from the controller) for splats, so > > we already have the tech for restarting or aborting the CI run. We > > don't need igt-runner to tell us. > > > > > I think this is another reason why trying at least to standardize this > > > stuff over drivers would be pretty good idea. > > > > > > > Additionally, some of the tests, like msm_recovery, are *expected* to > > > > generate some dmesg spam since they are intentionally triggering GPU > > > > hangs to test the recovery mechanism. > > > > > > Uh I don't like that. It just allows userspace to spam dmesg, which > > > doesn't seem like a great idea. That's at least why i915 dumps these > > > at a lower level, and in the past had a special "I'm going to whack > > > the gpu real hard expect hangs" knob in debugfs. > > > > > > Having tests which intentionally spam dmesg above info level isn't > > > really good since then you need endless amounts of test-specific > > > encoding of what is considered a success and what not. Like when a > > > backmerge breaks a testcases which is already at dmesg-fail, is that > > > bad or not? Probably bad, but was the situation before that really > > > good or already kinda on fire? > > > > I guess I could add some debugfs knobs to squelch the dmesg msgs on > > gpu hangs. In the normal case, I'd prefer that gpu hangs are not > > silent.. since that is something we get in feedback reports if a user > > (or dogfooder) reports a bug. > > > > The rockchip case I mentioned was some unrelated dmesg about > > linktraining failing.. presumably because there was no display > > attached? IDK, I didn't look too closely. But my point is we could > > be getting unrelated and asynchronous dmesg spam, even from other > > kernel subsystems. Letting that be part of the test results just > > sounds like asking for flakes. > > That's why I think you need to filter dmesg, otherwise you'll just get > random stuff in there that causes flaps. We've evolved a bit of that over the time, see: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/drm-ci/-/blob/main/.gitlab-ci/bare-metal/cros_servo_run.py#L94 It tends to be a bit specific to the runners and their quirks. But mesa does a lot of CI runs, so once-in-a-blue-moon quirks quickly turn frustrating if the CI machinery doesn't detect them, and (for ex) reboot and restart the DUT BR, -R > And then in another level you need different filtering to figure out > when your kernel is too busted and you need to reboot (like when > lockdep splats anywhere). > > Maybe we should pull that part of igt_runner out so that it can be > used in places where the full thing cant? Maybe even in mesa as a "my > kernel is in really bad shape" kinda test. There's a lot of tea leaves > reading heuristics involved in this stuff ime. > -Daniel > > > > > BR, > > -R > > > > > -Daniel > > > > > > > BR, > > > > -R > > > > > > > > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > http://blog.ffwll.ch
