Hi Sebastian, On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 06:27:08PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > This patch set introduces DT-aware irqchip and clocksource drivers for > Marvell Orion SoCs (Kirkwood, Dove, Orion5x, MV78x00) and corresponding > patches for Dove and Kirkwood to enable them for DT-boards. > > The irqchip driver, of course, depends on Thomas Gleixner's work on > irqdomain support for generic chip (tip irq/core). > > The ARM part of this patch set has a quite ridiculuous dependency havoc > of mv643xx_eth DT support (current net-next) that will add to both irqchip > and clocksource branches respectively. Therefore, I suggest that irq > and clocksource maintainers take in the mere drivers (Patches 1+2) and > Jason Cooper handles the remaining patches when all three drivers have > surfaced on mainline linux. > > I prepared a branch for anyone to test on Kirkwood and Dove which takes > care of the above dependencies based on v3.10-rc4 plus tip irq/core, > net-next, and arm-soc for-next (I know it is unstable but contains latest > mvebu related patches already). When Thomas, John, and Jason agree the > dependencies will vanish and only Jason has to take care of ARM patches > for enabling DT-based mv643xx_eth, irqchip, and clocksource. > > The branch can be found at > > git://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git orion-irqchip-for-v3.11 > > and has been tested on Dove/CuBox and compile tested for Kirkwood. > > Sebastian Hesselbarth (6): > irqchip: add support for Marvell Orion SoCs > clocksource: add Marvell Orion SoC timer > ARM: dove: move device tree nodes to DT irqchip and clocksource > ARM: kirkwood: move device tree nodes to DT irqchip and clocksource > ARM: dove: convert to DT irqchip and clocksource > ARM: kirkwood: convert to DT irqchip and clocksource > I've done some tests on my Kirkwood Openblocks A6 using the latest branch orion-irqchip-for-v3.11-v4. Everything works fine so: Tested-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> For patches 3 to 6 I'm wondering if there's any reason why the irqchip and clocksource changes are not separated. I'm probably being too picky but, unless you have a good reason for having them together, I think they should go separated, i.e. patches for irqchip on one side, and patches for clocksource on the other. Aside from that, the series looks good. Nice job! Thanks, -- Ezequiel García, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
