Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> The reference to `explicit_in_reply_to` is pointless as when the
> reference was added in the form of "#15" [1], Section 15) was "The
> canonical patch format".
> The reference of "#15" had not been properly updated in a couple of
> reorganizations during the plain-text SubmittingPatches era.
>
> Fix it by using `the_canonical_patch_format`.
>
> [1]: 2ae19acaa50a ("Documentation: Add "how to write a good patch summary" to SubmittingPatches")
>
> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 5903019b2a5e ("Documentation/SubmittingPatches: convert it to ReST markup")
> Fixes: 9b2c76777acc ("Documentation/SubmittingPatches: enrich the Sphinx output")
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v4.9+
> ---
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied, thanks.
jon
