[PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] bpf, docs: BPF_FROM_BE exists as alias for BPF_TO_BE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



According to include/uapi/linux/bpf.h:

  #define BPF_FROM_LE	BPF_TO_LE
  #define BPF_FROM_BE	BPF_TO_BE

BPF_FROM_BE exists as alias for BPF_TO_BE instead of BPF_TO_LE.

Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
index 30b019c..00b0800 100644
--- a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ Examples:
   dst_reg = htobe64(dst_reg)
 
 ``BPF_FROM_LE`` and ``BPF_FROM_BE`` exist as aliases for ``BPF_TO_LE`` and
-``BPF_TO_LE`` respetively.
+``BPF_TO_BE`` respetively.
 
 
 Jump instructions
-- 
2.1.0




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux