Re: [PATCH net v3 08/14] docs: netdev: rephrase the 'should I update patchwork' question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 08/14] docs: netdev: rephrase the 'should I update patchwork' question
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:40:22 -0700
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx, corbet@xxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andrew@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20220330042505.2902770-9-kuba@kernel.org>
References: <20220330042505.2902770-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20220330042505.2902770-9-kuba@kernel.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0

On 3/29/22 21:24, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

Make the question shorter and adjust the start of the answer accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>


Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
--
Florian

References:
- [PATCH net v3 00/14] docs: update and move the netdev-FAQ
  - From: Jakub Kicinski
- [PATCH net v3 08/14] docs: netdev: rephrase the 'should I update patchwork' question
  - From: Jakub Kicinski

Prev by Date: [PATCH v3 2/2] Documentation: dev-tools: Enhance static analysis section with discussion
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -rcu] rcu: docs: Update cross-references as suggested in doc-guide
Previous by thread: [PATCH net v3 08/14] docs: netdev: rephrase the 'should I update patchwork' question
Next by thread: [PATCH net v3 13/14] docs: netdev: broaden the new vs old code formatting guidelines
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux