Re: [PATCH] docs/bpf: Fix most/least significant bit typos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 3/19/22 5:43 PM, Mahmoud Abumandour wrote:
>> The LSB and MSB acronyms should not be followed by the word "bits". This
>> fixes this issue and uses the full phrases "most/least significant bits"
>> for better readibility.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Abumandour <ma.mandourr@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> What "issue" is being fixed here? Why would you not use the acronyms? It's fine
> as-is, not applying it.

I *think* that the nit being picked here is that the word "bits" after
an acronym like MSB is redundant...

jon



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux